2.13 Item; unit of product. 2.14 Nonconformity. Table 6 — Summary table of ISO 2859-1 sampling plans for normal and tightened inspection. Attributes — Part 0: Introduction to the ISO 2859 attribute sampling system, published by the. ISO 2859 is an internationally recognized standard that specifies an acceptance sampling system for inspection by attributes. It is indexed in terms of the acceptable quality level (AQL). The objective is to induce suppliers to maintain a quality level that is at least as good as the AQL specified by the buyer. At the same time, the system minimizes the statistical risk for a buyer of accepting an occasional poor lot. Sampling schemes designated in this part of ISO 2859 are applicable, but not limited, to the inspection of: • finished products • components and raw materials • materials in process • supplies in storage These schemes are intended primarily to be used for a continuing series of lots, i.e. A series that is long enough to allow switching rules to be applied. These rules provide: • Consumer protection (by means of a switch to tighten inspection) if a deterioration in quality is detected; • An incentive (at the discretion of buyer) to reduce inspection costs (by means of a switch to reduce inspection) if consistently good quality is achieved. Sampling plans in this section of ISO 2859 may also be used for the inspection of lots in isolation; however, the user is strongly advised to consult the operating characteristics curves to find a plan that will yield the desired protection. In which case, the user is referred to the sampling plans indexed by limiting quality (LQ) given in ISO 2859-2.This instruction indicates partial tables of the standard ISO 2859-1. This article introduces the different options available to buyers, when it comes to the representativity of inspection findings. Inspection level II (under “normal severity”) is appropriate for most inspections. But it is sometimes necessary to increase–or or reduce–the number of samples to check. The need for sampling, rather than 100% checking When controlling the quality of a batch of products, it is not practical to inspect 100% of them (unless the quantity is very small). Inspecting a large number of products takes a long time: it is expensive, and inspectors are less effective as they get tired. Actually, a 100% check does not yield that much more information than inspecting a statistically representative sample. The question becomes: how many products to check? Unreal engine marketplace - kubold rifle animset pro. Why different inspection levels? There is a fairly obvious principle in statistical quality control: the greater the order quantity, the higher the number of samples to check. But should the number of samples ONLY depend on the order quantity? What if this factory had many quality problems recently, and you suspect there are many defects? In this case, you might want more products to be checked. On the other hand, if an inspection requires tests that end up in product destruction, shouldn’t the sample size be drastically reduced? And if the quality issues are always present on all the products of a given batch (for reasons inherent to processes at work), why not check only a few samples? For these reasons, different levels are proposed by MIL-STD 105 E (the widely used standard for quality control in the form of acceptance sampling). By the way, that standard has formally been replaced by various commercial standards (ISO 2859-1, ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, and so forth). It is usually the buyer’s responsibility to choose the inspection level– more samples to check means more chances to reject bad products when they are bad, but it also means more days (and dollars) spent in inspection. The 3 “general” inspection levels Level I Has this supplier passed most previous inspections? Do you feel confident in their products quality? Instead of doing no quality control, buyers can check less samples by opting for a level-I inspection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |